Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods

Research Methods (Quantitative and Qualitative)

 

 

Submission:	Turnitin on vUWS. Emailed assignments or any other submission are not accepted. Submission is mandatory for passing the unit. Submission is possible only after scoring 100% at least once on the vUWS academic honesty quiz. Resubmission is not permitted.
Format:	Written report presented on Word document template supplied on vUWS. No cover-sheet. Format and presentation are assessable (i.e., worth marks). Assignments are to be typed preferably in Arial 12-point font, as per the template, or an almost identical font such as Calibri or Helvetica. Main text must be doubled-spaced (not 1½ spaced) with wide margins, as per the template. Spacing of 1½ lines is permitted only for the reference list. Single-line spacing is not permitted anywhere. The supplied document template for the assignment is formatted correctly for this assignment. Template formatting should not be modified. The original, left-justified paragraph formatting is recommended so text is not stretched across the page by wide spacing, especially in the reference list. Headers and footers, including page numbers, must be retained and updated with your name and student number in the footer on every page. Assignment text must be typed and not consist of embedded graphical objects. WORD LIMIT The 1200 word limit includes all text added to the template, including references, and also any text remaining from the original template. Thus, the word limit applies to the entire document. The word count for an assignment will be taken from the Turnitin submission, not the original document. Turnitin and word-processor word counts may differ. It is important to check the word-count according to Turnitin and fix any problem before the final submission. Assignments that are over the maximum permitted length of 1200 words will be penalised 1 mark out of 100% for every 25 words over limit, to a maximum of 50%. For example, an assignment which is 1300 words long will lose 4 marks out of 100%, or 0.8 marks out of 20. An assignment of 1400 words will lose marks out of 1.6 out of 20, and likewise for longer assignments.
Length:	1,200 words total document text as counted by Turnitin
Curriculum Mode:	Report

 

Task for the CONSORT assignment

A research article reporting a randomised controlled trial will be available on vUWS before the third tutorial. The article will report an experiment testing the effects of a treatment on at least one measure of health. You will evaluate the reporting quality of this report against selected criteria from the CONSORT statement for clinical trials. Criteria must be identified as CONSORT items, such as Item 1a, Item 1b and so on. Your appraisal is about the Title and Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion sections of the article. Also download from vUWS:

• The CONSORT statement and;
• A document template with sections matching the journal article. Use the template to write and submit the

What to write about

For the assignment journal article you are asked to evaluate what the authors have against what the CONSORT statement says should appear in a properly written clinical trial report. State what the authors have reported prop- erly, noting also what the authors have omitted to report or reported inadequately. Therefore, for each section of the article, try to identify:

 

1. Important and relevant CONSORT criteria that the authors have satisfied in their In this way, you identify where and how the authors have conformed to CONSORT criteria.
2. Important and relevant criteria that the authors have The authors could have overlooked important criteria or inadequately addressed them in the article. In this way, you are identifying where and how the authors have not conformed to CONSORT criteria.
3. Within each section of the assignment, briefly comment on the evidence-based practice implications of the reporting quality for that Persuasive commentary about evidence-based practice implications is essential for a Distinction or High Distinction score for that section.

“Important and relevant”means that the statement criteria and parts of the article you discuss affect the value of the article for evidence-based practice. You are not evaluating whether the authors have specifically discussed the CONSORT statement. The authors’ job is to describe their research, not to write about the CONSORT. Article authors need not even mention the CONSORT. Your task is to assess how well the research reporting matches

CONSORT criteria.

There is no need to add a literature review. The CONSORT statement and the supplied journal article are the only sources required. Use additional sources sparingly, if at all, and only where these extra sources build your argument and justify your conclusions instead of replacing your own thinking. Better is to use no additional sources. Where ideas from another source are used, that source must be cited and referenced. The so-called hourglass structure for essays, comprising an introduction, main text and conclusions should not be used. Text outside of the designated sections on the supplied template will score no marks but will contribute to the word count. Follow the structure of the supplied template exactly. Do not add to or delete sections of the assignment template.

CONSORT is about reporting, not scientific quality

Your assignment is about reporting quality of the article, not the scientific quality of the research. Your evaluation should concentrate on how well the authors have reported their research rather than how well scientifically the research was done. Avoid direct evaluation of the research question, background information, study design, measurement, sampling, procedure, analysis and interpretation, although you should critique how well these are reported, using the CONSORT statement and its items for guidance.

Where reporting quality has direct implications for scientific quality, that can be mentioned with priority given to the reporting quality. Raise scientific quality only where reporting quality enables or makes it harder for readers to evaluate critically the study’s rationale, its relevance and methods, the internal and external validity of the results, the authors’ interpretation and the applicability of the results for clinical practice.

Avoid this mistake!

Students must use only the journal article provided during this semester to complete this assessment task. A student who submits an assignment about an article other than the approved article will be asked to send the full-text article as an attachment or functioning link. The assignment will be marked on the basis of that article and the score halved. If the student does not provide full-text article on request, the assignment will score zero. Recycling your assignment or another students’ assignment from a previous semester is similarly unwise because that previous assignment will be about a different, unapproved article. Using another assignment extensively may lead to academic misconduct proceedings.

Scoring system for CONSORT appraisal

Scored sections of the assignment are matched to the major sections of the research article: Title and Abstract, Intro- duction, Method, Results and Discussion. Appraisal of the Title and Abstract together is worth 15 marks. Appraisals of the Introduction, Method, Results and Discussion are each worth 20 marks. APA citation and referencing, and assignment presentation are together worth 5 marks across the whole assignment. Hence: 15 + (4 x 20) + 5 = 100 marks. The total score out of 100, minus any applicable late submission and word-count penalties, will be multiplied by 0.20 to arrive at a score out of 20. Marks may be rounded when converted to a result out of 20. To get a high mark, write your assignment according the assessment criteria in the marking rubric. Take special notice of the High Distinction

 

criteria because they show what markers are really looking for. Expected standards are discussed in class. The general system for the grading of CONSORT evaluations is as follows:

• Fail =Poorly targeted, vague or inaccurate description, preventing effective evaluation or the identification of impli- cations for evidence-based practice; incorrect evaluation; standard of written expression below reasonable expectations for university assignments; academic
• Pass = Accurate, relevant description, only summarising the article but not accurately or comprehensively evaluating reporting quality; and therefore cannot effectively discuss implications of reporting quality for evidence-based
• Credit = Evaluates effectively; succeeds beyond mere description of the article but does not effectively discuss the implications of the reporting quality for evidence-based
• Distinction or High Distinction = Comprehensively and accurately describes, evaluates and also briefly yet persua- sively identifies the implications of the reporting quality for evidence-based

In summary: Evaluate the reporting quality of the article against identified, numbered CONSORT items, and suggest implications of the reporting quality for evidence-based practice.

Instead of submitting a cover-sheet (don’t submit a cover-sheet), when submitting your assignment to Turnitin you are implicitly confirming these statements:

• I retain a backup file of this assignment in case the original file is lost or
• No part of the assignment has been copied from any other student’s
• No part of the assignment is copied from any other source except where due acknowledgement is made in the assignment (citations and references).
• No part of the assignment has been written or produced by any other
• No part of this assignment has been made available to any other student so they can copy
• This same assessment item has not been previously submitted for any other
• The assignment document may be retained on the Turnitin database for future plagiarism
• Failure to uphold the above may lead to academic misconduct

The assignment template may include a final section asking you to rate the quality of your own work by choosing the overall grade you would give the assignment if you were marking it: Pass, Credit, Distinction or High Distinction. This option encourages you to reflect on your own work in relation to the marking criteria. Selecting a self-rated grade is voluntary (you don’t have to do it) and will not affect your final score.

 

 

Marking Criteria:

 

Criteria	High Distinction	Distinction	Credit	Pass	Unsatisfactory
Title and Abstract	2.6-3 marks	2.3-2.5	2.0-2.2 marks	1.5-1.9 marks	<1.5 marks
15% = 3 marks	Selected	Selected	Selected	Selection of	Selection of
Selection and	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items
identification of	identified by	identified by	identified by	identified by	not apparent or is
CONSORT items	number and	number and	number and	number or else	mostly incorrectly
and article Title	matched to correct	matched to correct	matched to correct	implicit and mostly	matched to section
and Abstract:	section of supplied	section of supplied	section of supplied	matched to correct	of supplied article
Accuracy of	article and relate to	article and relate to	article and relate to	section of supplied	or entirely unrelated
description and	evidence-based	evidence-based	evidence-based	article and at least	to evidence-based
relevance to	practice. Selected	practice. Selected	practice. Selected	partly related to	practice. Inaccurate
reporting quality	items and and	items and and	items and and	evidence-based	or imprecise
and evidence-based	article section	article section	article section	practice. Selected	description of
practice (EBP).	concisely and	concisely and	concisely and	items and and	supplied article
Validity of	accurately	accurately	accurately	article section	content or
evaluation of article	described and	described and	described and	mostly accurately	CONSORT items.
reporting quality	interpreted. Correct	interpreted. Correct	interpreted. Correct	described; could be	Unsatisfactory in
and relevance to	evaluation of article	evaluation of article	evaluation of article	more concise or	expression or
EBP. Identification	section reporting	section reporting	section reporting	precise. All or	originality. May use
of reporting quality	quality against	quality against	quality against	almost all to a	other than supplied
implications for EBP. Support for	selected items. Identifies valid and	selected items. Identifies valid and	selected items. All or almost all to a	satisfactory standard of	article.
claims and	important	important	good standard of	content, expression
arguments though	evidence-based	evidence-based	content, expression	and originality but
citation and	practice	practice	and originality but	lacks correct or any
matching to	implications of	implications of	lacks identification	evaluation of article
CONSORT and	article section	article section	of valid and	section reporting
article content.	reporting quality.	reporting quality.	important	quality against
Quality and	All to an exemplary	All or almost all to	evidence-based	selected items.
originality of	or very high	a high standard of	practice	CONSORT or
expression.	standard of content, expression and originality.	content, expression and originality. CONSORT and	implications of article section reporting quality.	article may not have been cited.
	CONSORT and article both cited.	article both cited.	CONSORT and article both cited.
Introduction	3.4-4 marks	3.0-3.3 marks	2.6-2.9 marks	2-2.5 marks	<2 marks
20% = 4 marks	Selected	Selected	Selected	Selection of	Selection of
Selection and	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items
identification of	identified by	identified by	identified by	identified by	not apparent or is
CONSORT items	number and	number and	number and	number or else	mostly incorrectly
and article	matched to correct	matched to correct	matched to correct	implicit and mostly	matched to section
Introduction:	section of supplied	section of supplied	section of supplied	matched to correct	of supplied article
Accuracy of	article and relate to	article and relate to	article and relate to	section of supplied	or entirely unrelated
description and	evidence-based	evidence-based	evidence-based	article and at least	to evidence-based
relevance to	practice. Selected	practice. Selected	practice. Selected	partly related to	practice. Inaccurate
reporting quality	items and and	items and and	items and and	evidence-based	or imprecise
and evidence-based	article section	article section	article section	practice. Selected	description of
practice (EBP).	concisely and	concisely and	concisely and	items and article	supplied article
Validity of	accurately	accurately	accurately	section mostly	content or
evaluation of article	described and	described and	described and	accurately	CONSORT items.
reporting quality	interpreted. Correct	interpreted. Correct	interpreted. Correct	described; could be	Unsatisfactory in
and relevance to	evaluation of article	evaluation of article	evaluation of article	more concise or	expression or
EBP. Identification	section reporting	section reporting	section reporting	precise. All or	originality. May use
of reporting quality	quality against	quality against	quality against	almost all to a	other than supplied
implications for EBP. Support for	selected items. Identifies valid and	selected items. Identifies valid and	selected items. All or almost all to a	satisfactory standard of	article.
claims and	important	important	good standard of	content, expression
arguments though	evidence-based	evidence-based	content, expression	and originality but
citation and	practice	practice	and originality but	lacks correct or any
matching to	implications of	implications of	lacks identification	evaluation of article
CONSORT and	article section	article section	of valid and	section reporting
article content.	reporting quality.	reporting quality.	important	quality against
Quality and originality of	All to an exemplary or very high	All or almost all to a high standard of	evidence-based practice	selected items
expression.	standard of content, expression and originality.	content, expression and originality.	implications of article section reporting quality.

 

Criteria	High Distinction	Distinction	Credit	Pass	Unsatisfactory
Methods	3.4-4 marks	3.0-3.3 marks	2.6-2.9 marks	2-2.5 marks	<2 marks
20% = 4 marks	Selected	Selected	Selected	Selection of	Selection of
Selection and	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items
identification of	identified by	identified by	identified by	identified by	not apparent or is
CONSORT items	number and	number and	number and	number or else	mostly incorrectly
and article	matched to correct	matched to correct	matched to correct	implicit and mostly	matched to section
Methods: Accuracy	section of supplied	section of supplied	section of supplied	matched to correct	of supplied article
of description and	article and relate to	article and relate to	article and relate to	section of supplied	or entirely unrelated
relevance to	evidence-based	evidence-based	evidence-based	article and at least	to evidence-based
reporting quality	practice. Selected	practice. Selected	practice. Selected	partly related to	practice. Inaccurate
and evidence-based	items and and	items and and	items and and	evidence-based	or imprecise
practice (EBP).	article section	article section	article section	practice. Selected	description of
Validity of	concisely and	concisely and	concisely and	items and article	supplied article
evaluation of article	accurately	accurately	accurately	section mostly	content or
reporting quality	described and	described and	described and	accurately	CONSORT items.
and relevance to	interpreted. Correct	interpreted. Correct	interpreted. Correct	described; could be	Unsatisfactory in
EBP. Identification	evaluation of article	evaluation of article	evaluation of article	more concise or	expression or
of reporting quality	section reporting	section reporting	section reporting	precise. All or	originality. May use
implications for	quality against	quality against	quality against	almost all to a	other than supplied
EBP. Support for claims and	selected items. Identifies valid and	selected items. Identifies valid and	selected items. All or almost all to a	satisfactory standard of	article.
arguments though	important	important	good standard of	content, expression
citation and	evidence-based	evidence-based	content, expression	and originality but
matching to	practice	practice	and originality but	lacks correct or any
CONSORT and	implications of	implications of	lacks identification	evaluation of article
article content.	article section	article section	of valid and	section reporting
Quality and	reporting quality.	reporting quality.	important	quality against
originality of expression.	All to an exemplary or very high standard of	All or almost all to a high standard of content, expression	evidence-based practice implications of	selected items.
	content, expression and originality.	and originality	article section reporting quality.
Results	3.4-4 marks	3.0-3.3 marks	2.6-2.9 marks	2-2.5 marks	<2 marks
20% = 4 marks	Selected	Selected	Selected	Selection of	Selection of
Selection and	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items
identification of	identified by	identified by	identified by	identified by	not apparent or is
CONSORT items	number and	number and	number and	number or else	mostly incorrectly
and article Results:	matched to correct	matched to correct	matched to correct	implicit and mostly	matched to section
Accuracy of	section of supplied	section of supplied	section of supplied	matched to correct	of supplied article
description and	article and relate to	article and relate to	article and relate to	section of supplied	or entirely unrelated
relevance to	evidence-based	evidence-based	evidence-based	article and at least	to evidence-based
reporting quality	practice. Selected	practice. Selected	practice. Selected	partly related to	practice. Inaccurate
and evidence-based	items and and	items and and	items and and	evidence-based	or imprecise
practice (EBP).	article section	article section	article section	practice. Selected	description of
Validity of	concisely and	concisely and	concisely and	items and article	supplied article
evaluation of article	accurately	accurately	accurately	section mostly	content or
reporting quality	described and	described and	described and	accurately	CONSORT items.
and relevance to	interpreted. Correct	interpreted. Correct	interpreted. Correct	described; could be	Unsatisfactory in
EBP. Identification	evaluation of article	evaluation of article	evaluation of article	more concise or	expression or
of reporting quality	section reporting	section reporting	section reporting	precise. All or	originality. May use
implications for	quality against	quality against	quality against	almost all to a	other than supplied
EBP. Support for claims and	selected items. Identifies valid and	selected items. Identifies valid and	selected items. All or almost all to a	satisfactory standard of	article.
arguments though	important	important	good standard of	content, expression
citation and	evidence-based	evidence-based	content, expression	and originality but
matching to	practice	practice	and originality but	lacks correct or any
CONSORT and	implications of	implications of	lacks identification	evaluation of article
article content.	article section	article section	of valid and	section reporting
Quality and	reporting quality.	reporting quality.	important	quality against
originality of expression.	All to an exemplary or very high standard of	All or almost all to a high standard of content, expression	evidence-based practice implications of	selected items.
	content, expression and originality	and originality.	article section reporting quality.

 

Criteria	High Distinction	Distinction	Credit	Pass	Unsatisfactory
Discussion	3.4-4 marks	3.0-3.3 marks	2.6-2.9 marks	2-2.5 marks	<2 marks
20% = 4 marks	Selected	Selected	Selected	Selection of	Selection of
Selection and	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items	CONSORT items
identification of	identified by	identified by	identified by	identified by	not apparent or is
CONSORT items	number and	number and	number and	number or else	mostly incorrectly
and article	matched to correct	matched to correct	matched to correct	implicit and mostly	matched to section
Discussion:	section of supplied	section of supplied	section of supplied	matched to correct	of supplied article
Accuracy of	article and relate to	article and relate to	article and relate to	section of supplied	or entirely unrelated
description and	evidence-based	evidence-based	evidence-based	article and at least	to evidence-based
relevance to	practice. Selected	practice. Selected	practice. Selected	partly related to	practice. Inaccurate
reporting quality	items and and	items and and	items and and	evidence-based	or imprecise
and evidence-based	article section	article section	article section	practice. Selected	description of
practice (EBP).	concisely and	concisely and	concisely and	items and article	supplied article
Validity of	accurately	accurately	accurately	section mostly	content or
evaluation of article	described and	described and	described and	accurately	CONSORT items.
reporting quality	interpreted. Correct	interpreted. Correct	interpreted. Correct	described; could be	Unsatisfactory in
and relevance to	evaluation of article	evaluation of article	evaluation of article	more concise or	expression or
EBP. Identification	section reporting	section reporting	section reporting	precise. All or	originality. May use
of reporting quality	quality against	quality against	quality against	almost all to a	other than supplied
implications for EBP. Support for	selected items. Identifies valid and	selected items. Identifies valid and	selected items. All or almost all to a	satisfactory standard of	article.
claims and	important	important	good standard of	content, expression
arguments though	evidence-based	evidence-based	content, expression	and originality but
citation and	practice	practice	and originality but	lacks correct or any
matching to	implications of	implications of	lacks identification	evaluation of article
CONSORT and	article section	article section	of valid and	section reporting
article content.	reporting quality.	reporting quality.	important	quality against
Quality and originality of	All to an exemplary or very high	All or almost all to a high standard of	evidence-based practice	selected items.
expression.	standard of content, expression and originality.	content, expression and originality.	implications of article section reporting quality.

 

Criteria	High Distinction	Distinction	Credit	Pass	Unsatisfactory
Document and APA	0.9 to 1 mark	0.8 marks	0.7 marks	0.5-0.6 marks	<0.5 marks
5% = 1 mark	Presentation	Presentation	Highly satisfactory;	Presentation	Pervasive
Conformity of	meticulous, to	accomplished, some	a few but only	acceptable but at	deficiencies in
document	professional	but not much scope	minor scope for	least several minor	formatting and APA
presentation	standard, difficult	for improvement.	improvement.	problems or a few	style consistently
(character, line,	to improve.	Headers, footers	Headers, footers	major problems.	against advice and
paragraph and page	Headers, footers	and page numbers	and page numbers	Student name and	instruction. Shows
formatting	and page numbers	supplied and	supplied and	number must be on	absence of detail or
including headers,	supplied and	correct. Name	correct. Name and	all pages.	lack of word
footer and page	correct.	and number on	student number on	Deviations from	processing
numbers) to	Name and number	every page. Some	every page. Several	template formatting	proficiency. Visually
supplied template	on every page.	but only a few	minor deviations	contrary to	unappealing or
and APA style for	Margins, font size,	minor	from assignment	instruction but not	impairing
citations, references	line, paragraph	deviations from	template in	impeding	readability.
and expression:	spacing and layout	assignment	margins, font size,	readability.	Assignment
format,	as per supplied	template in	line, paragraph	Single-spaced	template
punctuation, italics,	template. Font and	margins, font size,	spacing and layout	reference list. 1½	significantly
spacing, list	size and	line, paragraph	as per supplied	spaced main text.	modified contrary
ordering and other	spacing consistent	spacing and layout	template. Font and	Pages may not be	to instruction.
APA style	and identical to	as per supplied	size consistent and	numbered or	Multiple errors such
specifications	template throughout. No	template. Font and size consistent and	same or hardly different from	template title or header missing.	as single-line spacing in main
	modifications to	same or hardly	template.	May have obtrusive	text. Margins too
	assignment	different from	Double-spaced	stretched character	narrow, small
	template; no	template.	main text, double	spacing in main	font-size, exotic
	deletions, additions,	Double-spaced	or 1½ spaced	text through right	fonts or
	not even decorative.	main text, double	reference list.	margin justification.	unconventional
	Double-spaced	or 1½ spaced	Minor but not	All references cited	styles. Text may be
	main text, double	reference list.	extensive stretching	and all citations	graphical object.
	or 1½ spaced	Non-justified right	in character	have reference in	Header or footer or
	reference list.	margin; no	spacing. References	alphabetical order;	page number;
	Non-justified right	stretched character	similar in	reference list may	student name and
	margin; no	spacing. References	formatting to	be numbered.	number not on all
	stretched character	identical to	CONSORT and	Additional	pages. Missing
	spacing. References	CONSORT and	article entries in	references and	references or
	identical to	article entries in	tutorials;	citations, if any,	citations, not
	CONSORT and	tutorials. Additional	alphabetically	mostly correct to	alphabetically
	article entries in	references and	ordered. Additional	APA style. No	ordered or gross
	tutorials. Additional references and	citations, if any, mostly in	references and citations, if any,	cover-sheet.	deviations from APA. Web links as
	citations, if any, in	accordance with	mostly correct to		reference list
	accordance with	APA style. No	APA style. No		entries. Evidence of
	APA style. No cover-sheet.	cover-sheet.	cover-sheet.		plagiarism or other academic misconduct.
					Includes
					cover-sheet.

 

 

---

Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply

Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?

Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.

Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?

• Plagiarism free papers
• Timely delivery
• Any deadline
• Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
• Subject-relevant academic writer
• Adherence to paper instructions
• Ability to tackle bulk assignments
• Reasonable prices
• 24/7 Customer Support
• Get superb grades consistently

Online Academic Help With Different Subjects

Literature

Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.

Finance

Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.

Computer science

Computer science is a tough subject. Fortunately, our computer science experts are up to the match. No need to stress and have sleepless nights. Our academic writers will tackle all your computer science assignments and deliver them on time. Let us handle all your python, java, ruby, JavaScript, php , C+ assignments!

Psychology

While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.

Engineering

Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.

Nursing

In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.

Sociology

Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.

Business

We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!

Statistics

We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.

Law

Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.

What discipline/subjects do you deal in?

We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.

Are your writers competent enough to handle my paper?

Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.

What if I don’t like the paper?

There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.

Reasons being:

• When assigning your order, we match the paper’s discipline with the writer’s field/specialization. Since all our writers are graduates, we match the paper’s subject with the field the writer studied. For instance, if it’s a nursing paper, only a nursing graduate and writer will handle it. Furthermore, all our writers have academic writing experience and top-notch research skills.
• We have a quality assurance that reviews the paper before it gets to you. As such, we ensure that you get a paper that meets the required standard and will most definitely make the grade.

In the event that you don’t like your paper:

• The writer will revise the paper up to your pleasing. You have unlimited revisions. You simply need to highlight what specifically you don’t like about the paper, and the writer will make the amendments. The paper will be revised until you are satisfied. Revisions are free of charge
• We will have a different writer write the paper from scratch.
• Last resort, if the above does not work, we will refund your money.

Will the professor find out I didn’t write the paper myself?

Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.

What if the paper is plagiarized?

We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.

When will I get my paper?

You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.

Will anyone find out that I used your services?

We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.

How our Assignment Help Service Works

1. Place an order

You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.

2. Pay for the order

Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.

3. Track the progress

You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.

4. Download the paper

The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.

GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

---